Implantation of Acellular Nerve Allograft Using Nerve Connectors.

  • PubMed
  • May 4, 2025
  • 0 Comments

Implantation of Acellular Nerve Allograft Using Nerve Connectors.

Autor: Isaacs, Jonathan; Mallu, Satya; Patel, Gaurangkumar; Kite, Amy; Shah, Sagar; Graham, Gordon P.

Publication year: 2020

Hand (New York, N.Y.)

issn:1558-9455 1558-9447

doi: 10.1177/1558944719828009


Abstract:

Background: Nerve connectors are short nerve conduits used to approximate nerve ends. Acellular nerve allografts are viable alternatives when direct repair is not possible but do not produce exudate essential for fibrin clot formation. We hypothesize that acellular nerve allograft implanted using nerve connectors must have end-to-end contact with the in situ nerve stumps to support nerve regeneration. Methods: Sixty Sprague Dawley rats underwent a 14-mm unilateral tibial nerve injury and subsequent repair using various combinations of acellular nerve grafts and nerve connectors. Proximal repairs for all groups utilized direct contact with the nerve stump within connector. Variations in distal repair methods (allograft length, nerve gap, and connector length) defined our 4 groups-group A: 14 mm allograft, no distal gap, and distal connector; group B: 11.5 mm allograft, 2.5 mm distal gap, and distal connector; group C: 9 mm allograft, 5 mm distal gap, and distal connector; group D: 14 mm allograft, no distal gap, and no distal connector. At 3 months post-repair, function and histomorphology were assessed. Results: Developed muscle force was significantly lower in group C (0.073 ± 0.077 N) compared with the other 3 groups (group A = 0.529 ± 0.312 N, group B = 0.461 ± 0.462 N, and group D = 0.409 ± 0.327 N). Axon counts were significantly lower in group C (2121 ± 389) compared with group A (6401 ± 855), group B (4710 ± 755), and group D (4450 ± 126). There was no statistically significant difference in G-ratios (myelination) between groups (P > .05). Conclusion: Nerve regeneration was significantly impaired as the gap distance between the distal end of the allograft and the distal nerve stump increased to 5 mm.

Language: eng

Rights:

Pmid: 30782010

Tags: Animals; Rats; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Allografts; *Nerve Regeneration; *Peripheral Nerve Injuries/surgery; acellular nerve allograft; Axons; nerve; nerve connectors; nerve repair; rodent

Link: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30782010/

Related Posts

Comparing Rates of Diagnosis Using DSM-IV-TR Versus DSM-5 Criteria for Autism Spectrum Disorder.

Comparing Rates of Diagnosis Using DSM-IV-TR Versus DSM-5 Criteria for Autism Spectrum Disorder. Autor: Peters, W. Jason; Matson, Johnny L. Publication year: 2020 Journal of autism and developmental disorders issn:1573-3432…

Diabetes Mellitus-Associated Uveitis: Clinical Features in a Chilean Series.

Diabetes Mellitus-Associated Uveitis: Clinical Features in a Chilean Series. Autor: Sabat, Pablo E.; Anguita, Rodrigo; Saez, Victor; Morales, Sergio; Urzúa, Cristhian A.; Villarroel, Francisco A.; Velásquez, Víctor Publication year: 2020…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You Missed

Carmel High School Seniors Present Research at Prestigious Science Competitions

  • May 4, 2025
Carmel High School Seniors Present Research at Prestigious Science Competitions

Astronomers Detect Rare Cosmic Blasts That Could Signal Exotic Black Holes

  • May 4, 2025
Astronomers Detect Rare Cosmic Blasts That Could Signal Exotic Black Holes

Dire Wolves Spark Ethical Debate in Genetic Engineering

  • May 4, 2025
Dire Wolves Spark Ethical Debate in Genetic Engineering

Iran Prioritizes Scientific Collaboration with Neighboring Nations

  • May 4, 2025
Iran Prioritizes Scientific Collaboration with Neighboring Nations

Chemistry Teacher Builds Strong Bonds With Students Beyond the Classroom

  • May 4, 2025
Chemistry Teacher Builds Strong Bonds With Students Beyond the Classroom

Study Reveals Partisan Divide in Trust Toward Scientists in the U.S.

  • May 4, 2025
Study Reveals Partisan Divide in Trust Toward Scientists in the U.S.