Crowdsourced wildlife observation platform iNaturalist is gaining attention not for scientific research, but for its potential role in a criminal trial. Observations logged on the platform, which typically help track species distribution and biodiversity, may serve as part of the evidence in an ongoing murder case.
iNaturalist allows users to share sightings of plants and animals, compiling time-stamped and location-specific data that scientists and environmentalists use to monitor ecosystems. However, this wealth of detailed, reliable metadata can also be leveraged in legal investigations to help establish timelines and verify witness accounts.
In the current case, which remains under judicial consideration, iNaturalist data could help confirm or dispute timeline claims made by key individuals involved. For example, if someone recorded a plant or animal sighting on the app at a particular location and time, it might corroborate—or contradict—their stated whereabouts.
This case isn’t the first example of unusual uses for citizen science platforms. In previous instances, tools like GPS-linked camera apps, fitness trackers, and even social media posts have been used to verify timelines and movements in legal contexts.
As the trial proceeds, observers are keen to see how new forms of digital evidence like iNaturalist entries may become standard elements in both criminal and civil proceedings. It also raises questions about data privacy, consent, and the expanding role of digital footprints in everyday life.
The growing intersection between technology, citizen science, and the justice system underscores a shift in how digital tools are shaping not only scientific discovery but also the pursuit of truth in the courtroom.
Source: https:// – Courtesy of the original publisher.
