Retracted: T-peak to T-end Interval Predicts Appropriate Shocks in Patients with Heart Failure Undergoing Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Implantation for Primary Prophylaxis.

  • PubMed
  • May 4, 2025
  • 0 Comments

Retracted: T-peak to T-end Interval Predicts Appropriate Shocks in Patients with Heart Failure Undergoing Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Implantation for Primary Prophylaxis.

Autor: Sen, Ömer; Yilmaz, Samet; Sen, Fatih; Balcı, Kevser G.; Akboga, Mehmet K.; Yayla, Cagrı; Özeke, Özcan

Publication year: 2024

Annals of noninvasive electrocardiology : the official journal of the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology, Inc

issn:1542-474X 1082-720X

doi: 10.1111/anec.12383


Abstract:

BACKGROUND: T-wave peak to T-wave end interval (Tp-e) correlates with dispersion of ventricular repolarization. The purpose of this study was to assess the ability of Tp-e to predict appropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) shocks and all-cause mortality in patients who underwent ICD implantation for primary prophylaxis. METHODS: Two hundred twenty-eight patients with left ventricular ejection fraction ≤35% and an ICD implanted were followed-up prospectively. Patients divided into two subgroups according to presence of appropriate ICD shocks (Group 1: 112 patients with ICD shocks, Group 2: 116 patients without shocks). End points were appropriate ICD therapy due to ventricular tachycardia (VT)/ventricular fibrillation (VF), death, and a combined end point of VT/VF or death. RESULTS: During a mean follow-up of 22.3 ± 7.7 months, appropriate ICD shocks were observed in 112 of 228 patients (49.1%). The mean duration of the Tp-e Group 1 was significantly longer than Group 2 (115.3 ± 22.2 vs 104.7 ± 20.2 ms, P < 0.001). Ischemic etiology and Tp-e duration were found to be independent predictors of ICD therapy. When the patients were divided into two groups based on Tp-e interval, there was no significant difference regarding the mortality between groups (21.2% vs 21.8%, P: 0.186). However, appropriate ICD shocks due to VT/VF (37.5% vs 58.8%, P < 0.001) and combined end point (39.4% vs 64.5%, P: 0.002) were significantly higher in patients with longer Tp-e group. CONCLUSIONS: Tp-e interval independently predicts appropriate ICD shocks in patients with systolic dysfunction and ICDs implanted for primary prevention. Language: eng Rights: © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Pmid: 27265779 Tags: Link: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27265779/

Related Posts

Comparing Rates of Diagnosis Using DSM-IV-TR Versus DSM-5 Criteria for Autism Spectrum Disorder.

Comparing Rates of Diagnosis Using DSM-IV-TR Versus DSM-5 Criteria for Autism Spectrum Disorder. Autor: Peters, W. Jason; Matson, Johnny L. Publication year: 2020 Journal of autism and developmental disorders issn:1573-3432…

Diabetes Mellitus-Associated Uveitis: Clinical Features in a Chilean Series.

Diabetes Mellitus-Associated Uveitis: Clinical Features in a Chilean Series. Autor: Sabat, Pablo E.; Anguita, Rodrigo; Saez, Victor; Morales, Sergio; Urzúa, Cristhian A.; Villarroel, Francisco A.; Velásquez, Víctor Publication year: 2020…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You Missed

Carmel High School Seniors Present Research at Prestigious Science Competitions

  • May 4, 2025
Carmel High School Seniors Present Research at Prestigious Science Competitions

Astronomers Detect Rare Cosmic Blasts That Could Signal Exotic Black Holes

  • May 4, 2025
Astronomers Detect Rare Cosmic Blasts That Could Signal Exotic Black Holes

Dire Wolves Spark Ethical Debate in Genetic Engineering

  • May 4, 2025
Dire Wolves Spark Ethical Debate in Genetic Engineering

Iran Prioritizes Scientific Collaboration with Neighboring Nations

  • May 4, 2025
Iran Prioritizes Scientific Collaboration with Neighboring Nations

Chemistry Teacher Builds Strong Bonds With Students Beyond the Classroom

  • May 4, 2025
Chemistry Teacher Builds Strong Bonds With Students Beyond the Classroom

Study Reveals Partisan Divide in Trust Toward Scientists in the U.S.

  • May 4, 2025
Study Reveals Partisan Divide in Trust Toward Scientists in the U.S.