Research reveals a stark partisan divide in the types of academic studies cited by Republican and Democratic policymakers when advocating for data and technology-related legislation. A recent analysis by scholars at the Kellogg School of Management shows that each political party predominantly references studies that align with its ideological perspectives, resulting in minimal overlap in the evidence used to justify their policy positions.
The study examined a broad range of policy documents and legislative records, identifying the academic sources both parties used to bolster their arguments. The findings suggest that while both Democrats and Republicans value scholarly research, they often rely on distinctly different sets of studies and experts, reinforcing their existing viewpoints rather than bridging ideological gaps.
This divergence raises concerns about the potential for bipartisan policy development in emerging areas such as data privacy, artificial intelligence, and digital surveillance. With little shared evidentiary foundation, lawmakers may find it increasingly difficult to reach consensus on critical technology policy issues that require coordinated and unified approaches.
The researchers argue that fostering dialogue across ideological lines and promoting awareness of credible, nonpartisan academic work may help mitigate this divide. However, absent efforts to create a shared understanding of the technological landscape, the polarization of evidence may continue to hinder effective policymaking.
Source: https:// – Courtesy of the original publisher.
