Behind the Wheel: Process Evaluation of a Safe-Transport Program for Older Drivers Delivered in a Randomized Controlled Trial.

  • PubMed
  • May 4, 2025
  • 0 Comments

Behind the Wheel: Process Evaluation of a Safe-Transport Program for Older Drivers Delivered in a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Autor: Coxon, Kristy; Hunter, Kate; Chevalier, Anna; Brown, Julie; Clarke, Elizabeth; Rogers, Kris; Boufous, Soufiane; Ivers, Rebecca; Keay, Lisa

Publication year: 2020

Journal of applied gerontology : the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society

issn:1552-4523 0733-4648

doi: 10.1177/0733464818811015


Abstract:

This process evaluation explores relationships between program outcomes and intervention implementation in a trial evaluating “Behind the Wheel,” an education-based safe-transport program for older drivers. Participants (intervention group) were 190 Sydney drivers aged ⩾75 years (M = 80 ± 4years). Process measures included fidelity, dose delivered, and received. Outcomes were self-reported driving regulation and objectively measured driving exposure. Relationships were explored using regression models. Older drivers who took ownership of driving retirement and self-regulation by developing plans were more likely to reduce their weekly driving, (β = 38 km, 95% confidence interval (CI) = [7.5,68.7]), and night driving (β = 7 km, 95% CI = [3.5, 10.4]). Drivers of older age (odds ratio [OR] = 1.1/year older, 95% CI = [1.05, 1.3]) had greater odds of developing driving retirement plans. Female drivers (OR = 2.7,95% CI = [1.1, 6.9]), drivers with poorer function (OR = 1.2/5-point decrease on DriveSafe, 95% CI = [1.04, 1.4]), and worse health (OR = 1.2/additional medication, 95% CI = [1.02, 1.5]) had greater odds of developing safe mobility plans. This program had greatest impact with older, lower functioning drivers. A stronger message was delivered and received, as intended, to older drivers with lower function and poorer health. Our logic model can help channel resources to drivers who benefit most.

Language: eng

Rights:

Pmid: 30466338

Tags: Humans; Aged; Female; Australia; Self Report; *Automobile Driving; Accidents, Traffic; aging; Safety; education; safety; Geriatric Assessment; Health Status; process evaluation; community mobility; driving; logic models; naturalistic driving

Link: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30466338/

  • Related Posts

    Comparing Rates of Diagnosis Using DSM-IV-TR Versus DSM-5 Criteria for Autism Spectrum Disorder.

    Comparing Rates of Diagnosis Using DSM-IV-TR Versus DSM-5 Criteria for Autism Spectrum Disorder. Autor: Peters, W. Jason; Matson, Johnny L. Publication year: 2020 Journal of autism and developmental disorders issn:1573-3432…

    Diabetes Mellitus-Associated Uveitis: Clinical Features in a Chilean Series.

    Diabetes Mellitus-Associated Uveitis: Clinical Features in a Chilean Series. Autor: Sabat, Pablo E.; Anguita, Rodrigo; Saez, Victor; Morales, Sergio; Urzúa, Cristhian A.; Villarroel, Francisco A.; Velásquez, Víctor Publication year: 2020…

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    You Missed

    Carmel High School Seniors Present Research at Prestigious Science Competitions

    • May 4, 2025
    Carmel High School Seniors Present Research at Prestigious Science Competitions

    Astronomers Detect Rare Cosmic Blasts That Could Signal Exotic Black Holes

    • May 4, 2025
    Astronomers Detect Rare Cosmic Blasts That Could Signal Exotic Black Holes

    Dire Wolves Spark Ethical Debate in Genetic Engineering

    • May 4, 2025
    Dire Wolves Spark Ethical Debate in Genetic Engineering

    Iran Prioritizes Scientific Collaboration with Neighboring Nations

    • May 4, 2025
    Iran Prioritizes Scientific Collaboration with Neighboring Nations

    Chemistry Teacher Builds Strong Bonds With Students Beyond the Classroom

    • May 4, 2025
    Chemistry Teacher Builds Strong Bonds With Students Beyond the Classroom

    Study Reveals Partisan Divide in Trust Toward Scientists in the U.S.

    • May 4, 2025
    Study Reveals Partisan Divide in Trust Toward Scientists in the U.S.