A digital therapeutic for people with borderline personality disorder in Germany (EPADIP-BPD): a pragmatic, assessor-blind, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial

  • PubMed
  • April 17, 2025
  • 0 Comments

A digital therapeutic for people with borderline personality disorder in Germany (EPADIP-BPD): a pragmatic, assessor-blind, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial

Lancet Psychiatry. 2025 May;12(5):366-376. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(25)00063-X.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Fewer than 25% of patients with borderline personality disorder (BPD) receive guideline-adherent psychotherapy. Digital therapeutics can help reduce this gap. Therefore, we tested the effectiveness and safety of priovi, a digital therapeutic for BPD.

METHODS: We conducted a pragmatic, assessor-blind, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial, recruiting patients with BPD, according to DSM-5 classification, of at least moderate severity on the 23-item Borderline Symptom List (BSL-23) via online advertisements in Germany. Patients were aged 18 years or older, agreed on an emergency plan for suicidal crises, and gave informed consent to participate. Patients were excluded if they had a primary diagnosis of a substance use disorder or a diagnosis of a psychotic disorder. Simple computerised coin-toss randomisation (1:1) without stratification was used to assign patients to either the unguided digital therapeutic based on schema therapy together with treatment as usual (TAU; intervention group) or TAU alone (control group) and study investigators were masked to group assignment until after the analysis of the primary outcome and main safety outcome. All patients could use any form of usual care. The control group received freely available BPD-specific self-help material. The primary outcome was the time by treatment interaction in the intention-to-treat sample at 3 months measured by BSL-23 score. Safety was established via the number of serious adverse events (ie, suicide attempts, other life-threatening events, and hospitalisation), assessed via online questionnaire. Individuals with BPD were involved in the development of the digital therapeutic, but not in the design of this study. The trial was registered on German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00028888) and is completed.

FINDINGS: Between May 3 and Oct 20, 2022, 1766 patients were screened for eligibility and 580 patients (520 [90%] women, 47 [8%] men, and 13 [2%] gender diverse) were randomly assigned to the intervention group (n=302) and control group (n=278). Ethnicity data were not recorded. At the primary timepoint of 3 months, 35 (12%) patients dropped out of the intervention group and 15 (5%) of the control group. The median age of patients was 29 years (IQR 24-37). Intention-to-treat analysis with linear mixed models showed a significant time by treatment interaction (p=0·0005) at 3 months in favour of the intervention group (d=0·24 [95% CI 0·07-0·42]). Regarding safety, there were significantly fewer suicide attempts in the intervention group (n=7) than in the control group (n=21; incidence rate ratio 0·34 [95% CI 0·14-0·79]; p=0·0081) and there were no differences regarding other serious adverse events.

INTERPRETATION: This trial provides tentative evidence of the effectiveness and absence of safety concerns of the digital therapeutic, priovi, in the treatment of individuals with BPD.

FUNDING: GAIA.

PMID:40245074 | DOI:10.1016/S2215-0366(25)00063-X

Authors: Nele Assmann, Gitta Jacob, Anja Schaich, Thomas Berger, Tristan Zindler, Linda Betz, Stefan Borgwardt, Arnoud Arntz, Eva Fassbinder, Jan Philipp Klein

Published: 2025-04-17 10:00:00

Read the full article: View on PubMed

  • Related Posts

    Clinical and cost-effectiveness of lithium versus quetiapine augmentation for treatment-resistant depression in adults: LQD a pragmatic randomised controlled trial

    Health Technol Assess. 2025 May;29(12):1-118. doi: 10.3310/YQVF5347. ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Lithium and several atypical antipsychotics are the recommended first-line augmentation options for treatment-resistant depression; however, few studies have compared them directly,…

    Did a digital quality of life (QOL) assessment and practice support system in home health care improve the QOL of older adults living with life-limiting conditions and of their family caregivers? A mixed-methods pragmatic randomized controlled trial

    PLoS One. 2025 May 6;20(5):e0320306. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0320306. eCollection 2025. ABSTRACT We aimed to improve the quality of life (QOL) of homecare patients (≥ 55 years of age) who had chronic…

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    You Missed

    West Johnston High and Triangle Math and Science Academy Compete in Brain Game Playoff

    • May 10, 2025
    West Johnston High and Triangle Math and Science Academy Compete in Brain Game Playoff

    New Study Reveals ‘Ice Piracy’ Phenomenon Accelerating Glacier Loss in West Antarctica

    • May 10, 2025
    New Study Reveals ‘Ice Piracy’ Phenomenon Accelerating Glacier Loss in West Antarctica

    New Study Suggests Certain Chemicals Disrupt Circadian Rhythm Like Caffeine

    • May 10, 2025
    New Study Suggests Certain Chemicals Disrupt Circadian Rhythm Like Caffeine

    Hospitalization Rates for Infants Under 8 Months Drop Significantly, Data Shows

    • May 10, 2025
    Hospitalization Rates for Infants Under 8 Months Drop Significantly, Data Shows

    Fleet Science Center Alters Anniversary Celebrations After Losing Grant Funding

    • May 10, 2025
    Fleet Science Center Alters Anniversary Celebrations After Losing Grant Funding

    How Microwaves Actually Work: A Scientific Breakdown

    • May 10, 2025
    How Microwaves Actually Work: A Scientific Breakdown