Preoperative Site Marking: Are We Adhering to Good Surgical Practice?

Preoperative Site Marking: Are We Adhering to Good Surgical Practice?

Autor: Bathla, Sonia; Chadwick, Michael; Nevins, Edward J.; Seward, Joanna

Publication year: 2021

Journal of patient safety

issn:1549-8425 1549-8417

doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000398


Abstract:

OBJECTIVES: Wrong-site surgery is a never event and a serious, preventable patient safety incident. Within the United Kingdom, national guidance has been issued to minimize the risk of such events. The mandate includes preoperative marking of all surgical patients. This study aimed to quantify regional variation in practice within general surgery and opinions of the surgeons, to help guide the formulation and implementation of a regional general surgery preoperative marking protocol. METHODS: A SurveyMonkey questionnaire was designed and distributed to 120 surgeons within the Mersey region, United Kingdom. This included all surgical trainees in Mersey (47 registrars, 56 core trainees), 15 consultants, and 2 surgical care practitioners. This sought to ascertain their routine practice and how they would choose to mark for 12 index procedures in general surgery, if mandated to do so. RESULTS: A total of 72 responses (60%) were obtained to the SurveyMonkey questionnaire. Only 26 (36.1%) said that they routinely marked all of their patients preoperatively. The operating surgeon marked the patient in 69% of responses, with the remainder delegating this task. Markings were visible after draping in only 55.6% of marked cases. CONCLUSIONS: Based on our findings, surgeons may not be adhering to “Good Surgical Practice”; practice is widely variable and surgeons are largely opposed and resistant to marking patients unless laterality is involved. We suggest that all surgeons need to be actively engaged in the design of local marking protocols to gain support, change practice, and reduce errors.

Language: eng

Rights: Copyright © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

Pmid: 28661999

Tags: Humans; Surveys and Questionnaires; *Medical Errors; Patients; *Surgeons; United Kingdom; Preoperative Care

Link: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28661999/

Related Posts

COVID-19 Case Rates in Chicago: Vaccinated vs Unvaccinated

COVID-19 Outcomes by Vaccination Status Vaccinated vs Unvaccinated COVID-19 Case Rates COVID-19 Case Rates in Chicago: Vaccinated vs Unvaccinated COVID-19 Outcomes by Vaccination Status This historical dataset shows the weekly…

Comparing Rates of Diagnosis Using DSM-IV-TR Versus DSM-5 Criteria for Autism Spectrum Disorder.

Comparing Rates of Diagnosis Using DSM-IV-TR Versus DSM-5 Criteria for Autism Spectrum Disorder. Autor: Peters, W. Jason; Matson, Johnny L. Publication year: 2020 Journal of autism and developmental disorders issn:1573-3432…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You Missed

COVID-19 Case Rates in Chicago: Vaccinated vs Unvaccinated

COVID-19 Case Rates in Chicago: Vaccinated vs Unvaccinated

President Trump Open to Further Delays on TikTok Ban

President Trump Open to Further Delays on TikTok Ban

Trump Extends Trade War Rhetoric to Entertainment Industry

Trump Extends Trade War Rhetoric to Entertainment Industry

Duolingo Shifts to AI-First Strategy, Replacing Contractors with Artificial Intelligence

Duolingo Shifts to AI-First Strategy, Replacing Contractors with Artificial Intelligence

U.S. Stock Futures Dip After S&P 500 Hits Record High

U.S. Stock Futures Dip After S&P 500 Hits Record High

Airbnb Launches AI Customer Service Bot in the U.S.

Airbnb Launches AI Customer Service Bot in the U.S.